While the Solicitor General of India and the power  ministry had pitched in with a recommendation for allocation of 12 mmscmd of gas  to NTPC, the petroleum ministry, which, as the secretariat of the EGOM, put  forward the following background brief on the matter to the  EGOM: Implications of the judgment  on NTPC matter:
 MoP has requested that EGOM should consider the proposal for  allocation of 12 mmscmd gas to NTPC at discovered ICB price of US$2.34/mmbtu  without waiting for outcome of pending NTPC suit in High Court of Mumbai.  Proposal is for supply of gas to NTPC`s proposed Kawas & Gandhar expansion  projects having capacity of 2600 MW. 
 The Supreme Court has held  that "it is to be noted that the price determined by the Government is not the  subject matter of either the Company Application nor is it an issue which arises  out of the impugned judgment. There is no duly constituted proceedings where any  challenge has been laid to Government Policy, price, fixation, grant or refusal  of approval. Further, without such proceeding in existence and without NTPC  being a party in present proceedings, any issue touching upon the validity of  price fixation or price formula does not arise." 
 Decisions on NTPC matter in earlier EGOM  meetings
 Meeting on October 23,  2008: Regarding NTPC-RIL sale price, views expressed by Law Minister were  noted. It was decided that verdict of the court should be  awaited.
 January 8,  2009: "Supply of natural gas to various  upcoming/proposed power plants, including inter alia Dadri Power Project:  Requirement for these plants was considered. EGOM noted that several power  projects including Dadri Power Project are in pipeline after receiving necessary  clearance and permission. Referring to decision taken at meeting on 23.10.2008  (para 2D), EGOM decided that subject to availability of gas, necessary  allocations from RIL KG D6 fields will be made to these projects in pipeline  including Dadri Power Project as and when they are ready to commence production.  This will be without prejudice to decisions of Court cases."

No comments:
Post a Comment